Twinery?

My opinion, at first I thought twinery was an app like Kahoot. In this twinery, we can make questions, but it is a little other

 learning tool applications. 

The Twinery was a bit cumbersome when I first used it, but different from after trying it again it

 turned out to be very interesting. In this twinery, we can make story telling, and we can make

 a kind of question and then there is a choice of answers that can be clicked. It's very 

interesting, but the diagrammatic form of the twinery makes me confused, where is the arrow going?”

 but that has no effect at all with the questions or story telling we make. For this twinery application,

 I have to go deeper first, because I don't understand it yet. So in the future I'm still confused

 whether I will use it or not.

I explain again the advantages and disadvantages of this winery:

Advantages: 
Text-based storytelling. Twine is very text-focused, though you can use
     images, sound, and video.
Branching narratives. Twine's user interface is designed to make it easy to
     visualize the flow through branches of a narrative.
Web-based publishing. Twine publishes to HTML files which can be uploaded
     on any web hosting service or shared privately. People can play the things
     you make without installing any extra software.
Disadvantages:
This is especially difficult to define, because authors are so ingenious and
constantly push at the boundaries of what is possible. Because Twine is deeply
enmeshed with the web platform, anything that can be done in a browser can be
done with Twine--but you might be better-served using a different tool. 
Heavy use of multimedia. It's possible to incorporate images, sound, and
     video into the things you create with Twine, but the workflow can feel
     awkward, especially if you are using lots of multimedia assets. You might
     be happier using a tool like Ren'Py.
Online and multiplayer play. There have been experiments with making Twine
     games that are playable by multiple people simultaneously, but doing so
     requires a good deal of programming knowledge. There have not been many
     modern successors to the MUD model,
     but Seltani is one.
Works that involve a world
     model, or that use interaction models other than clicking links, like a
     text parser or a graphical world. Inform or Bitsy, for example, might be better fits
     for these.
 
                                                     I think that’s all , thank youJ